Original PromptCreate a 20-minute small group intervention lesson (5-10 students) that builds 6th graders' ability to identify and analyze claims with relevant evidence in argumentative writing. The lesson should include scaffolded practice where students identify strong versus weak reasoning, then read an argument and analyze the strength of the claims and evidence. Focus on developing critical thinking skills through peer discussion and immediate formative feedback, ensuring students can transfer these skill...
This resource is designed to help students analyze arguments by differentiating between strong and weak reasoning. It covers the essential elements of a claim and the supporting evidence required to substantiate it. Starting with an engaging activity that encourages observation and inquiry, students learn to identify claims and evidence in various contexts. The resource provides examples of strong versus weak reasoning, inviting students to improve weak claims by adding credible support. Through the use of a Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER) organizer, students develop critical thinking skills by evaluating the validity of arguments presented in a real-world context, specifically relating to park funding. The final tasks encourage collaboration and reflection, reinforcing their understanding of effective argumentation and the importance of supporting claims with reliable data.