This document explores the contributions of Hugo Munsterberg, a pioneer in applying psychology to the legal field over a century ago. It highlights his belief that understanding memory could improve court proceedings and the skepticism he faced from legal professionals who valued eyewitness testimony without scientific backing. The document also poses reflective questions and activities that encourage critical thinking about the reliability of memory in legal contexts, illustrating how different witnesses can perceive the same event in contrasting ways due to the nature of human memory. Additionally, it provides historical context on the tension between psychological insight and legal practices in Munsterberg's era.