The check decides what happens Monday.
Build formative checks from standards-aligned questions already in the plan. Results appear by standard as students submit. See the weak question and the students who missed it while there is still time to plan the reteach.
Every item carries its standard, so mastery rolls up standard by standard, and the coverage map fills in on its own.
Developing, meeting, exceeding. You see it while there’s still time to act. By last period you know Q3 sank, and one button builds the reteach.
Below, on, above, Spanish: the support changes, the points and the key don’t.
The check should change what happens next.
Friday’s check assembles from items that already know their standard, their depth, and their answer.
1/4 + 3/8 · from Tuesday’s practice · used twice last year
DOK 2from the district bank · STAAR-aligned
DOK 3from your Week 13 exit ticket
DOK 1Pull a question in and the paper builds on the right — points totaling as you go.
steppers, and the paper total updates live
2 ptsraise it and the distractors tighten to match
DOK 2prints on the paper, rolls up to the strand map
5.3Hset once — every version scores against it
B · 5/8 ✓No side spreadsheet, no answer sheet to retype — the item is the record.
every standard this week taught, checked against the paper
×5 · 0 untaggedflags a check that’s all recall before it prints
DOK 1–3 mixAccept, tweak, or dismiss — the check ships when you say it does.
the ladder changes rigor of access, not the objective
Same key ✓glossary and frames ride along for the three who need them
Same key ✓totals hold across every version
One columnGive it, and giving it documents the coverage. Grading picks up from here.
From standards and question banks to coverage and grading.
See results by standard and question.
Every item cites its standard, so Friday’s check rolls up by concept on its own, and the weakest one names its own reteach.
Mastery updates as you grade — nothing applies itself.
Know which students are slipping, before the test.
Every check feeds a quiet roster view: who’s developing, who’s meeting, who’s exceeding, with the concept gap named and the accommodations already on file. Ida drafts the intervention; you decide.
Groups, not rankings — scores stay between you and each student.
Strong verbally — ask him to talk through Q5 before he writes.
Q5 pattern — “add the tops, add the bottoms.”
Suggestions only — nothing applies itself.
Built for districts.
Any tool can print a quiz. The evidence trail it leaves is the product.
Building checks rehearse the standards the district tests, same blueprints, same calendar.
Blueprint-alignedItem-level evidence rolls up by course and building, the accreditation binder writes itself.
Audit-readyCommon assessments stay comparable across sections: same key, different levels of support.
ComparableChoosing for a school or a district? Rollout, SSO · SIS, and the VPAT live on their own page, with the one-pager your board will ask for.
For districtsMC, multi-answer, fill-in, matching, short and long answer & more, mixable, per-item points.
12+ item typesYour resources, last year’s checks, the district bank, one search, filtered by standard.
3 sources, 1 searchThe standard rides the question, prints on paper, drives coverage, rolls into mastery.
Per itemUpload an old test, items and key detected, reviewed once, scored forever.
Key detectedBelow, on, above, ES/EN from the same items. Points and key never change.
1 key, N versionsDistrict testing days come off the calendar, your check moves out of the way.
Calendar-awareDifficulty, distractor frequency, who-chose-what, landing with the scores.
Live item stats